Missouri lawmakers seek to end physical discipline in state schools

By St. Louis Post-Dispatch, adapted by Newsela staff
Apr. 23, 2014corporal-punishment-684ef4aa.jpg.885x490_q90_box-0,183,2000,1292_crop_detail

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. — Jennifer Kavanaugh has been a teacher for 13 years. During that time, she never dreamed of hitting a child — not even once.

Kavanaugh is now a fifth-grade teacher at St. Margaret of Scotland School in St. Louis. Previously, she taught in a school where children were physically punished for bad behavior, but she never participated.

She knows there are teachers across the state who do, however, and she wants it stopped.

“All studies point to the fact that corporal punishment does not make for a more peaceful, happier child,” she said at the state Capitol on Wednesday.

Bill Bans Spanking

Kavanaugh and about 30 of her fifth-grade students attended a hearing Wednesday on a bill, sponsored by Democratic state Sen. Joe Keaveny, that would ban corporal punishment, or spanking, in both public and private schools in the state. The Senate Committee on Progress and Development unanimously passed the bill Wednesday afternoon.

“We need to stop assaulting our kids,” Keaveny said.

Missouri and 18 other states still allow corporal punishment in schools. The most recent states to ban it were New Mexico in 2011 and Ohio in 2009.

The country’s patchwork laws can be attributed to a 1977 Supreme Court ruling that left the issue up to the states. In the court case Ingraham v. Wright, Florida students argued that the state’s corporal punishment policy violated both their Eighth Amendment protection against “cruel and unusual punishment” and their 14th Amendment protection against unequal treatment. The court upheld Florida’s policy.

In Missouri, each school district is required to have a written policy on corporal punishment. If it is used, the local board of education must determine how it will be used and whether a parent will be notified or can opt for a different form of discipline.

The department does not keep track of which districts in the state use corporal punishment. However, in 2009 the Missouri School Boards’ Association estimated that at least 70 districts in the state had policies allowing the use of corporal punishment.

Some Do, Some Don’t

A Post-Dispatch inquiry found that many districts in the St. Louis area — including St. Louis, Clayton, Lindbergh and Riverview Gardens — do not allow this type of discipline.

The Ferguson-Florissant district’s disciplinary policy also does not include spanking. District officials believe there are better ways to discipline a child, ranging from teacher-parent conferences to suspending or expelling the student, district spokeswoman Jana Shortt said.

But some districts do allow the practice. About 4,200 students across the state were physically punished in the 2009-2010 school year, the most recent year for which numbers are available.

The Fox School District in Jefferson County used to allow spanking in its schools, but it changed its policy in the early 2000s, said district official Lorenzo Rizzi.

“I think the board of education no longer sees it as a proper way to punish kids,” Rizzi said. “The use of physical response doesn’t change behavior — oftentimes it escalates.”

The trend away from corporal punishment mirrors a national trend. For the 2009-2010 school year, about 184,500 students were physically punished, compared with about 223,000 in the 2005-2006 school year.

Covers Private Schools

A decrease, however, is not enough for Kavanaugh. She wants to see teachers use positive behavior supports.

“We need to require more of teachers,” she said.

No one spoke against the bill at Wednesday’s hearing. However, Democratic state Sen. Gina Walsh voiced concern about including private schools in the bill.

“I do not support corporal punishment, but my parents sent me to a faith-based school … I’m opposed to government interfering” when it comes to such schools, she said.

Senate Minority Leader and committee Chairwoman Jolie Justus said she wanted to move the bill forward but believed there could be a hang-up on the private school portion.

“I suspect we’ll hear from people who don’t want state intervention in private schools,” Justus said. “At some point, we may need some compromise when some folks come and talk to us. Right now, I haven’t heard any opposition.”

kevin torres

Staff Cartoonist, NMHS Blue Prints

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>